The Origin of May Day

Chuck Morse Amazon Kindle Page

 http://t.co/oxZNlr94Fw

On May 1, 1776, Adam Weishaupt, a professor of Canon Law at the University of Ingolstadt, established a secret society in Munich Bavaria known as the Order of the Illuminati. From that time until today, May Day, which has origins in ancient Rome, has been observed as an international holiday by Socialists, Communists, and by other so-called progressives. The modern origin of May Day is well known and is viewed as accepted history in Europe, yet the origins of May Day, which commemorates the founding of the Illuminati, is virtually unknown to Americans.

Adam Weishaupt described the immediate goal of his secret society, originally called the Perfectablists, as nothing short of the abolition of the Monarchies and religion in Europe. The ultimate goal of the Illuminati, a goal to be achieved gradually, was what Weishaupt, who used the name Spartacus in his secret society, referred to in his writings as the creation of a “New World Order.”

The Illuminati then, like the left today, was largely made up of wealthy aristocratic types and middle class intellectuals, those to whom we now refer to as the top 1% and their supporters. The exclusive club back then, as it does today, marketed itself as the champion of the poor while gradually gathering the strands of wealth, power and influence into their own hidden hands.

After its 1776 founding, which was ironically the same year as the issuance of the freedom oriented American Declaration of Independence, the Illuminati spread rapidly across Europe by means of its initiates infiltrating and attempting to dominate the already existing and generally conservative Freemasonic lodges of the major European cities. The Illuminati was exposed when a currier carrying its secret papers was arrested in Bavaria in 1784. Further investigations by Bavarian authorities led to the banishment of Weishaupt and his organization. Weishaupt spent the rest of his life under surveillance as a court councilor to Duke Ernst of the Duchy of Gotha where he died in 1811. In exile, Weishaupt wrote A Complete History of the Persecutions of the Illuminati in Bavaria (1785), A Picture of Illuminism (1786), An Apology for the Illuminati (1786), and An Improved System of Illuminism (1787).

According to the French Jesuit priest Agustin Barruel, 1741-1828, who published an authoritative four volume set entitled “Memoirs Illustrating the History of Jacobinism”1798-1799, the Illuminati established the Jacobin Club that would subvert and disseminate the otherwise peaceful and pro-American 1789 French Revolution in 1793. The Jacobins, who were responsible for beheading the popular French King Louis XVI and his wife Marie Antoinette, launched the Reign of Terror and established the world’s first Communist regime. Fr. Barruel claimed to have gathered his information for his books from the Illuminati papers that had been confiscated by the Bavarian authorities.

George Washington, whose presidency coincided with the Jacobin Reign of Terror, expressed concern about the Illuminati coming to America in a letter, archived in the Library of Congress, dated October 24, 1798, in which he wrote: it was not my intention to doubt that, the Doctrines of the Illuminati, and principles of Jacobinism had not spread in the United States. On the contrary, no one is more truly satisfied of this fact than I am.

Whether the Illuminati continue in the formal sense is not known and is not relevant. What is known is that the ideas initiated by the Illuminati, ideas that were expounded upon by Karl Marx and Frederick Engles, continue marching through history. Marx manifesto expanded the initial proposition of Weishaupt, an end to governments and Christianity as a means to create a new world order, by proposing, in addition, an end to private property, the family, business, free trade and, indeed, to end individual identity itself. Once these goals were accomplished, according to Marx, once mankind had become collectivized, than all government would “wither away” and man would exist in a state of perfect equality.

May Day should be observed as a day to remember the tens of millions of victims of the demented utopian fantasies that were launched on that day by Adam Weishaupt. Their blood cries out from the grave for truth and for justice.   

A Jew examines the Holocaust

Chuck Morse Amazon Kindle Page

 http://t.co/oxZNlr94Fw

http://www.jewishmag.com/32mag/morse/morse.htm

Comprehending the Incomprehensible

By Charles Morse

As an American Jew, rarely does a week go by in which I don’t find myself attempting to comprehend the incomprehensible. Like most Jews, I have tried to grapple with the systematic annihilation of six million of my fellow Jews, not only in terms of what happened, but also why it happened and what can be learned from it. The blood of six million innocent people cries out from the grave for an explanation. Only by understanding the causes of the Holocaust can we begin the process of insuring that this genocide will never happen again.

Establishment thinkers, in my opinion, have approached the issue strictly from a factual basis rather than engaging in a systemic, cause and effect examination. While the work of proving and documenting the Holocaust is extremely important work, and while a theoretical examination can only be built on a solid historical recounting of events, an understanding of the implications of the Holocaust has been given short shrift. The only general explanation offered seems to be that Hitler and the Nazis were Anti- Semites. While this is obviously true and central to the Holocaust, as an explanation for the Holocaust itself , this is unsatisfactory and incomplete. The truth, which unfortunately most Jewish and non-Jewish intellectuals resist, is that Nazism, like Communism, was a socialist movement.

The National Socialists or Nazis were animated by the same spirit as their left wing International Socialist or Communist comrades. Both socialisms were driven by a quasi-religious desire to create a perfectible human species living in a utopian New World Order. The Nazis believed that the road to perfection, or the ubermench, was the isolation and elimination of races that were determined to be impure. The Communist road to utopia, or Homo Sovietica, required, to quote Lenin, the “liquidation” of groups based on class or political designations. In other words,”Enemies of the people” or “Enemies of the State”. This would result, theoretically, in a “workers paradise”. Both Socialist visions, like the ability to fly or live forever, are contrary to human nature. Only the force of arms can be employed to try to create the impossible. As a result, both socialisms have and do result in Holocausts.

How could we expect otherwise? Planned events occur such as the Reichtag fire that precipitated Hitler’s suspension of the German constitution or the Communist inspired burning of American inner cities in the summer of 1967, then a highly organized clique of “leaders” step forward to rescue us from catastrophe. When will we ever learn? The infantile and false idea that humanity can be “transformed” collectively and that the purpose of the State is to effect this transformation is the most evil notion ever invented. It is possible for individuals to transform themselves voluntarily and within a context of freedom. This occurs after an individual humbly recognizes his imperfect nature. We are not God, but created in Gods image and only a reflection of the creator.

Both Nazism and Communism are imperialistic and are fueled by a vision of world conquest. Nazism employs the method of blitzkrieg or total war while Communism uses subversion of the social order by boring from within. The socialist scheme of control from the top, by “enlightened” experts, requires world conquest with the utter suppression of opposition. It is a hybrid of both left wing and Nazi socialist ideology that holds sway over much of our American power elite today.

The dictionary definition of socialism is “public ownership of the mode of production” which is to say, someone else owns that which you produce. The Socialist State, whether Nazi or Communist, owns “the mode of production” and holds title to life, liberty and property. Communism is the more honest in that there are no pretences in terms of who owns “the mode of production” . All forms of property, communication, education, life, and anything that moves are controlled by the left wing Communist State. As a monopoly corporation, the State, or the “Dictatorship of the Proletariat”, possesses everything in the name of “the people” and for the “common good”.

The Nazi model retains the pretension of private ownership with the State exercising selective and ultimate control. For example, the Nazis wasted no time confiscating the property of Jews and others whenever they chose. Select corporations operate in a Nazi State with monopoly power and by supporting the government in its program.

Both Socialisms are slave systems, at least as oppressive as the chattel slavery of the Old South. In the case of Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia, each representing the ultimate manifestation of the socialist experiment, thhis form of slavery was more pervasive and deadly than any in history. Loss of property means loss of freedom. The American system is the opposite as we recognize our endowment by the Creator with individual sovereignty. We grant government limited authority for the purpose of protecting and insuring that sovereignty. This is the natural state of existence and represents true human progress.

We must not overlook the religion of the two Socialisms. Nazism was fueled by the occult, Nordic mythology, earth worship, divination, race and ethnic consciousness, and other beliefs and practices that are comparable to the “New Age” movement so prevalent amongst our cultural elite’s today. Communism was atheistic and worshipped the State in the place of God. Both faiths derive moral standards from the caprice of their respective leadership rather than a fundamental notion of morality. Moral considerations were molded by conditions relative to absolute power, which is the highest socialist ideal. Both faiths hold the destruction of individuality, marriage, private industry, and national sovereignty as paramount to their mystical notions of collectivism.

In spite of massive and exhaustive studies of the Holocaust against the Jews, we have not come to terms with its actual nature. Much of our leadership and centers of power and influence continue to be swayed by the same ideas that eventually resulted in both Nazism and Communism. Our government is increasingly seizing power over our private lives and property through legislation often dressed up in such nice sounding aphorisms as protecting the environment, creating public safety, or civil rights. Our government is ceding elective constitutional responsibilities to appointed bureaucracies and international organizations. We are turning our back on God with the resulting cheapening of human life and forming a culture of death. There is no reason to assume that the accumulated end result of these trends will be any different than boxcars heading for Auschwitz..

Has President Obama been a disappointment?

Chuck Morse Amazon Kindle Page

 http://t.co/oxZNlr94Fw

http://www.helium.com/items/2069521-has-president-obama-been-a-disappointment

Has President Obama been a disappointment?

No doubt President Barack Obama has been a terrible disappointment to the far left, the ten percent of Americans who support universal healthcare and all of the other various programs that they hoped would expand government authority over the lives and property of Americans. The left was generally aware of Obama’s far left-wing background and political orientation and as such they expected more from him. Another group that appears to be disappointed with Obama are the multitudes of idealistic and impressionable young people who were emotionally swept up by the talk of hope and change and all of the other meaningless slogans and euphemisms that made up the warp and woof of his message. During the 2008 campaign, Obama was known to deliver his speeches from a podium with the word “change” festooned on the front. And who could forget those tacky Styrofoam Greek columns at his acceptance speech.

Candidate Obama was the classic tabula rasa, the clean blank slate in which the voters could ascribe their own values. As such, many independents, many moderates, and even some conservatives convinced themselves that he was one of them. After he took office the independents and moderates, the suburban families, the urban Catholics who voted for him left in droves when it became obvious that he intended to govern from the left. This occurred while the left became disillusioned as their ideological straitjacket prevented them from realizing that Obama could not possibly fulfill their authoritarian agenda simply because the country and the Congress were not interested. Meanwhile, the young and the restless waited breathlessly but to no avail for a magical experience of hope and change.

Perhaps the most significant and real accomplishment of Barack Obama as president, one that should not in any way be discounted, is the fact that he is black. I remember the day after the election, walking into Panera Bread and spontaneously congratulating and shaking hands with a group of African-American men who happened to be walking out. They were beaming with pride and excitement and I felt moved and exited for them. Obama’s election was indeed moving especially for those of us over forty who never imagined that a black man could be elected president. Perhaps the most enduring social change that will hopefully emerge from the Obama presidency is that America will enter into a post-racial era. As an added bonus, Obama appears to love his wife and he has two nice kids that my 12 year old daughter can emulate.

In the final analysis, Barack Obama has not been a disappointment at all because he has efficiently continued to carry out the policies of the Bush Administration. Obama as seamlessly transitioned from the Bush foreign policy by preserving the peace in Iraq and continuing forth in Afghanistan. Obama continues Bush’s war against Islamic terrorism. After some silly talk about closing Guantanamo and moving it to Chicago and after suggesting that the detainees be tried in Manhattan, he seems to have quietly dropped this type of nonsense. Perhaps all along he only meant to make such asinine gestures as boo bait for the left-wing bubbas. Obama has wisely also continued the Bush economic policies of bailing out industries that are too big to fail including General Motors.

Obama will probably continue to get better especially now that the Republicans have taken over the House of Representatives. Already he agreed not to raise taxes in the lame duck session. If Obama keeps tacking to the right there should be no reason why he should not be re-elected in 2012.  

Learn more about this author, Chuck Morse.
 Click here to send this author comments or questions.

     

Darwin and the Nazi Holocaust

Chuck Morse Amazon Kindle Page

 http://t.co/oxZNlr94Fw

		The Monkey Trial - Evolutionary Politics in the post-Traditional Age by Chuck Morse Kindle Price: $3.75 Auto-delivered wirelessly

April 19 is Yom Ha-Shoah, Holocaust Remembrance Day. In order to honor the day and to remember the dead, it is proper to reflect upon how the genocide against the six million Jews of Europe happened and why. The answers to this question are obviously complex and varied but the question must nevertheless be asked continuously and not a stone must be left unturned in the quest for understanding. Only in this way can we insure that it never happens again.

The influence of Charles Darwin’s Theory of Evolution on the Nazi movement and the Nazi way of thinking must be considered as part of the mix of ideas that made up the Nazi core. Darwin’s theory, in its essence, is a theory of breeding, what Darwin called “natural selection.” The word “species” is Latin for race and Darwin used the words species and race interchangeably in his writings. Darwin’s work was infused with the idea of impending doom for the human “species” unless the evolutionary process was advanced. Darwin wrote of the survival of the fittest and he viewed this as a natural process in which the superior, or the more evolved members of the human species would advance while the so-called inferior members would naturally die off or be annihilated. Darwin was heavily influenced by the scarcity theories of Thomas Malthus, the world’s first advocate of population control as a means to save mankind.

The belief in biological evolution formed the core of Nazi thinking. They believed that the Aryan race, a mythic conception that they derived partially from the theosophy of Madame Helena Petrova Blavatsky, was a more evolved species or, to use the vernacular, a superior race. They believed that if the Aryan were properly bred, and if the blood of inferior races were bred out of the potential Aryan population, than a new and more evolved species would emerge, what they called the Ubermench, or the Superman. The Ubermench, bred from the blood of German Nordic stock, would be blond, with blue eyes, would possess a perfect physique, would live up to two centuries, and would possess cosmic consciousness.

Like Darwin, and like many of his followers, the Nazis believed in the concept of scarcity and that time was running out to save mankind. They believed that the best way forward was to evolve a better species of human beings. They believed it was their moral duty to isolate and to cull the populations of lesser species as they defined the term. Ironically, they did not believe that the Jews were an inferior species but rather they considered the Jews to be a highly evolved species that posed as a lethal threat to the supremacy of the Aryan species. Thus, they reasoned, in order for the Aryans to lead mankind toward the more evolved and perfected stage of biological human development, the Ubermenchen, the Jews had to be annihilated.

From a Darwinian perspective, the Nazi theory actually made sense. Unlike the Judeo-Christian concept, which holds that all men and women are created in the image of God, and are therefore created equal, the Nazis, deriving their idea from the scientific notions of the theory of evolution, believed that men and women were born un-equal and in different stages of the evolutionary cycle. Thus, to the Nazis, the German was more evolved than the non-German and was therefore more fit to survive. 

Darwin captured the essence of the Nazi outlook in the following quote from his second book The Descent of Man:

At some future period not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace the savage races throughout the world. At the same time, the anthropomorphous apes…will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilized state, as we may hope, even then the Caucasian, and some ape as low as the baboon, instead of as now between the negro or Australian and the gorilla. 

Obama Foreclosure Scandal

Chuck Morse Amazon Kindle Page

 http://t.co/oxZNlr94Fw

Why has it taken the Obama Administration over three years to address the foreclosure scandal and have they actually addressed it? The scandal, which has been referred to in some quarters as “Foreclosure-gate” involves mortgage companies using a phony practice called “robo-signing” in order to fraudulently foreclose on homeowners. The company behind most of these so-called robo-signings is called Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, known as MERS. This national privately owned company has served as a clearinghouse and as a rapid computer generated paperwork processor for the big banks and secondary mortgage investors seeking to process and re-process mortgages. MERS tracks an average of 65 million mortgages by computer and processes mortgage transactions without human intervention. The MERS process is presently being challenged in court in several states and jurisdictions.

MERS worked closely with Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the other big national mortgage lenders in the years leading up to the mortgage meltdown and the Trillian dollar TARP bailout. MERS had aided in the process of bundling, in the creation of credit default swaps, and in derivative leveraging by making the process seamless and efficient.

Before becoming Attorney General, Eric Holder worked as a partner in the white shoe law firm of Covington & Burling which represented MERS. In 2006, while Holder was a partner, Covington and Burling defended MERS in a growing number of lawsuits brought by local municipalities and title providers which claimed that MERS was bypassing conventional methods of processing mortgages. It should be noted that as Attorney General, Eric Holder has failed to investigate these practices by MERS, by Fannie and Freddie, and by the banks who received TARP funds. There have been no investigations, no indictments, and no significant changes in the status quo regarding these banking practice since Holder and Obama have been in office. Indeed, billions in TARP funds have continued to flow to Fannie and Freddie.

Once the robo-signing scandal came to light, after a 60 Minutes expose in October, 2010, Holder, under political pressure, assigned several investigators to the case, investigators who, like himself, are former employees of Covington and Burling. Holder also directed the FBI to partner with the Mortgage Banking Association, MBA, which represents the banks implicated in this practice, as part of their investigation. Working together, Holder’s FBI and the MBA, developed a definition of mortgage fraud which exempts MERS and the big banks. Thus the banks will not be investigated under the protective wing of the Obama Administration.  Instead, the FBI will be going after small-time operators and mortgage holders.

Meanwhile, the foreclosure settlement is so confusing and vague that it is unlikely that any relief will be received by those who were defrauded by the robo-signatures any time soon. In fact, it is being projected that the practical effect of the settlement will be that the big banks will increase the number of foreclosures with the assurance that they will be protected by the immunity clause in the agreement. Another byproduct of the settlement has been that housing courts around the country have become choked with a backlog of cases. All the while, Obama is trotting out the agreement as a cornerstone of his justification for re-election.

The failure of the Obama Administration Attorney General Holder to investigate the mortgage scandal should be the focus of a congressional investigation. Such an investigation might open the whole can or worms around the TARP bailout of Fannie, Freddie and the big banks and  the Obama Administration’s tepid actions toward banking reform and investigation of fraud.  

Chuck Morse Amazon Kindle Page

 http://t.co/oxZNlr94Fw

Member Center | Log Out

Today's Globe    Opinion    Politics    Magazine    Education    Science    NECN    Special reports    Obituaries

Traffic  |  Weather  |  Mobile

HOME > NEWS > NATION Frank, Morse in series of debates By Benjamin Gedan, Globe Correspondent  |  October 25, 2004 NEW BEDFORD -- To prepare for his debate last night against the man praised as a premier orator in Congress, Chuck Morse studied tapes of John F. Kennedy's debate with Richard Nixon. His opponent, US Representative Barney Frank, went to Florida to campaign with Teresa Heinz Kerry. Morse and Frank have faced off several times during this campaign, as Morse struggles for attention and votes in his long-shot bid to unseat the 24-year congressman from Newton. Frank, however, already is looking past his congressional race against Morse, eyeing a run for the US Senate if John F. Kerry wins his race for the White House. But Morse is hoping to slow Frank down. ''I'm a pretty good communicator," said Morse, a conservative radio talk-show host. ''I can certainly hold my own against Barney Frank." Frank, sounding a bit like a prize fighter sizing up a regular sparring partner, was unimpressed: ''I didn't notice any great skill," Frank said of Morse, before last night's event at New Bedford's Wamsutta Club. ''He began our first debate saying he was intimidated." Frank, 58, was rated by a CSPAN survey as the Democratic Party's most effective speaker. The September issue of The Washingtonian magazine called him the Democrats' best debater in Congress. An earlier debate with Frank in Mattapoisett left Morse ''stammering," according to an account in the New Bedford Standard Times. Morse's spokesman, Ben Kilgore, conceded he was ''too polite." Throughout the campaign, Morse has accused Frank of weakening immigration laws that were designed to block terrorists from obtaining visas. Morse says the laws might have helped keep out the 9/11 terrorists, a charge Frank denies. During his seven years hosting ''Morse Code" on WROL-950 AM in Quincy, Morse says, he debated Frank by phone three times. In March, the two dueled over Iraq policy, an encounter that left Morse confident he could take on the veteran congressman. On his radio show and cable TV program in Brookline, Morse has sparred with such liberal heavyweights as Howard Zinn, Gloria Steinem, and Noam Chomsky. Talkers magazine listed him among the ''hot 100 upcoming talk-show hosts in America." He has acknowledged his uphill battle. Frank bought $350,000 of air time, mostly on Boston TV stations, in what was seen as an effort to raise his profile in case he runs for Senate. He has raised more than $1 million through Sept. 30. Morse has $140,000 in his campaign account. Yet Frank has agreed to hold several debates with Morse, including the Oct. 14 encounter at Old Rochester Regional High School in Mattapoisett and another three days later in Newton for a cable TV program scheduled to be shown today on local access Channel 9 at 2:09 p.m. After last night's scheduled debate in New Bedford, the candidates plan a final meeting tonight on New England Cable News. Last night, Morse planned to criticize Frank, a member of the House Financial Services Committee, for allowing Sovereign Bank to cut 350 jobs in New Bedford after buying Compass Bank. The purchase emptied one of the city's largest office buildings, Morse said. He also hoped to portray Frank as bored of his job. Benjamin Gedan can be reached at gedan@globe.com. © Copyright 2006 Globe Newspaper Company.

Chuck Morse Amazon Kindle Page

 http://t.co/oxZNlr94Fw

Member Center | Log Out

Today's Globe    Opinion    Politics    Magazine    Education    Science    NECN    Special reports    Obituaries

Traffic  |  Weather  |  Mobile

HOME > NEWS > NATION Frank, Morse spar over Iraq, book claims By Benjamin Gedan, Globe Correspondent  |  October 25, 2004 NEW BEDFORD -- To prepare for his debate last night against one of the quickest quippers in Congress, Chuck Morse studied tapes of John F. Kennedy's debate with Richard Nixon. His opponent, US Representative Barney Frank, skimmed passages from Morse's book, "Why I am a Right Wing Extremist." Frank's preparation paid off. Last night, the 24-year congressman from Newton skewered Morse for what Frank said were glowing passages about former Senator Joseph McCarthy and for a suggestion that President Clinton was behind the Oklahoma City bombing. "I don't think his defense of Senator Joseph McCarthy was jocular," Frank said, rejecting Morse's claim that the book was meant to be parody. "I understand you support McCarthy -- you emulate him." Morse largely defended his essays but said the book did not represent his platform. "I'm not backing away," he said, "and I'm not running as poet laureate." The hour-long debate was the third campaign encounter between Frank and Morse, in what even Morse concedes is his long-shot bid to unseat the veteran Democrat. Frank is treating the race much like a prize fighter treats a sparring partner; he already is readying a run for the US Senate if John F. Kerry wins his race for the White House. Morse just hopes to slow down Frank. "I'm a pretty good communicator," insisted Morse, a conservative radio talk-show host, assessing the debates he has had with Frank during the campaign. "I can certainly hold my own against Barney Frank." Frank is not impressed: "I didn't notice any great skill," Frank said of Morse, before last night's event at New Bedford's Wamsutta Club. "He began our first debate saying he was intimidated." Frank spent most of last night's heated debate disputing Morse's wide-ranging allegations, including a charge that legislation Frank sponsored in 1990 helped the 9/11 hijackers enter the United States. Responding to claims that his ties to industry lobbyists cost New Bedford banking jobs, Frank began the debate by calling Morse's attacks "the local version of the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth." Speaking to a crowd of 50 in New Bedford, Morse criticized Frank for standing by as Sovereign Bank cut 350 jobs after buying Compass Bank. He also said the Democratic representative could not work with the state's Republican governor, Mitt Romney, or the Republicans in the White House and in Congress. "Where does Barney Frank turn?" he asked. In other clashes, Morse defended the invasion of Iraq, which Frank called a $120 billion "unnecessary war." Morse also praised the Patriot Act, which Frank opposed, as well as the $89 billion spending bill on Iraq and Afghanistan. Frank, 58, was rated by a CSPAN survey as the Democratic Party's most effective speaker. The September issue of The Washingtonian magazine called him the Democrats' best debater in Congress. On his AM radio show, "Morse Code" on WROL, and cable TV program in Brookline, Morse has sparred with such liberal heavyweights as Howard Zinn, Gloria Steinem, and Noam Chomsky. "Talkers Magazine" listed him among the "hot 100 upcoming talk show hosts in America." He debated Frank by phone three times on his talk-radio show. In March, the two dueled over Iraq policy, an encounter that left Morse confident he could take on the veteran representative. An earlier debate with Frank in Mattapoisett left Morse "stammering," according to an account in the New Bedford Standard Times. Morse's spokesman, Ben Kilgore, conceded he was "too polite." "Morse is a good talker, but he knows absolutely nothing about anything," said Kay Reis, 70, a longtime member of the League of Women Voters, which sponsored the Mattapoisett debate. "Barney encouraged him to make a raving fool of himself and he obliged." Morse has acknowledged his uphill battle. Frank recently purchased $350,000 of air time, mostly on Boston TV stations, in what was seen as an effort to raise his profile in case he runs for Senate. He has raised more than $1 million through Sept. 30. Morse has $140,000 in his campaign account. Frank has agreed to debate Morse several times, including the Oct. 14 encounter at Old Rochester Regional High School in Mattapoisett and another debate three days later in Newton for a cable TV program scheduled to be shown today on local access Channel 9 at 2:09 p.m. The candidates plan a final meeting tonight on New England Cable News. © Copyright 2006 Globe Newspaper Company.