English

Thursday, February 11, 2016

Series: Causes of the Holocaust Part 2.

Series: Causes of the Holocaust Part 1.

Friday, January 29, 2016

Share International Part 2

Share International Part 1

Saturday, January 23, 2016

BLS Debate Coaches Part 2

BLS Debate Coaches Part 1

Saturday, December 26, 2015

PAYCHECK PROTECTION: Chuck Morse as your benefits consultant

PAYCHECK PROTECTION: Chuck Morse as your benefits consultant: Dear Business Owner, HR Director, With a background in business, as the former CEO of my own company, City Metro Enterprises, which was a...

Friday, December 18, 2015

Maccabee Project 2

Maccabee Project Part 1

Friday, December 11, 2015

Nation of Islam II

Nation of Islam

Sunday, December 6, 2015

The True Story of Hanukah

Chuck Morse is the author of The Nazi Connection to Islamic Terrorism, The War against Judaism, and the soon to be released Communism is not dead

The story of Hanukah holds universal political and religious significance. This is a story of political and religious freedom, a story that is particularly relevant today. Hanukah celebrates the military victory of the Jewish Hasmonean leader Mattasyahu and his five sons, led by Judah, who is known as the Maccabee which is translated to mean the Hammer, against the vastly superior forces of the Syrian Greek Emperor Antiochus IV Epiphanes, 165 BC.

The devoutly Jewish Hasmoneans fought a war of independence against Antiochus for two reasons. Firstly, the Greek emperor has banned Jewish practice, including Temple worship, which was replaced by Idol worship before a statue of Zeus that was propped up on the Temple Mount. The Greeks were supported by traitorous anti-religious Hellenized Jews in Judaea who shared Antiochus agenda to destroy Judaism. Besides the outright ban of Jewish worship, including a ban on observing Sabbath, which was punishable by death, Antiochus promoted practices that would undermine Jewish morality such as nude sporting events. Many of the Hellenized Jews were so anxious to assimilate into secularized Greek culture that they created false foreskins to hide their circumcisions in order to get by in the homoerotic gymnasium.

Against all odds Judah successfully defeated the Syrian forces and established a sovereign Jewish State in the vicinity of Jerusalem. That state would subsequently be strengthened and, in the process, this Jewish commonwealth saved and advanced the Jewish faith. The small cruise of oil that burned eight days, oil that was required to purify the Temple in the days after the Hasmonean victory and after years of defilement, represents a rare event by which a divine sign was manifested, one that essentially blessed Judah and his struggling government.

Thus we commemorate that event, by lighting the Menorah candles for eight days, in order to reflect on its meaning.  Hanukah stands for national sovereignty and Hanukah honors those who have sacrificed in its defense. The Hasmoneans established Jewish sovereignty for the same reasons that peoples establish sovereignty and those are the establishment of freedom and right of self and national determination.  By creating a sovereign nation, the Hasmoneans were a light unto the nations of the world.


Hanukah stands for religious freedom and self-determination, the right of a people to worship in freedom as this was the motivating factor behind the Hasmonean revolt. By re-establishing the Jewish State, the Hasmoneans re-established the covenant between God and the Jewish people, the moral and ethical code of Sinai and the faith and mission of Judaism. This inspires all people of faith who seek freedom and to live in peace and co-exist with others of different faiths.

Jewish Lives Matter

Jewish Lives Matter
Chuck Morse


Chuck Morse is the author of The Nazi Connection to Islamic Terrorism, The War against Judaism and the soon to be released book Communism is not Dead.


I attended the funeral of Ezra Schwartz; the young American citizen brutally murdered in Israel by a Jew hater who targeted him for slaughter because he was a Jew. His father, trying to make sense out of this atrocity, movingly observed that Ezra had lived a meaningful life and that his death was a meaningful death.


Indeed Ezra’s death is made meaningful by understanding why he was cut down in the prime of his life. His senseless death was part of an accelerating war against the Jews, a war that is also consuming the Christian world as it did on September 11, 2001 and in Paris. While the Jews are the canary in the mine-shaft, the entire non-Islamic world is now under siege.


The Arab agitation against Israel, the so-called Palestinian conflict, once the mask is ripped off, is nothing more than the vanguard action in this war. The Arabs are not in need of another sovereign nation, they already have over twenty, several of which are rich in land and oil. The Arab agenda is to destroy Israel in two phases and it is motivated, at its core, by Jew hatred.


Jew hatred is the animating force behind the international left-liberal establishment, including segments of the liberal Jewish establishment, as they push Israel toward destruction. The left hates Israel and Jews for two reasons. They hate Israel because it is capitalist and because it is Jewish. As an essentially capitalist society, Israel represents the aspirations of the free individual in control of his own life and destiny. This threatens not only the totalitarian Arab societies but it also threatens an international left that seeks to subsume the conscious individual into the semi-subservience of a global entity.


They hate Israel for being Jewish because of what Judaism represents, a belief in God as the creator and the law-giver as opposed to their conception of the state as the locus of authority. Judaism represents the swash-buckling individual, the family, education, free trade in goods, services and ideas, and a belief in a moral and ethical code that is divine and thus out of reach of human manipulation. They seek to destroy those values, to replace them with collectivism and the one world ant colony.


The idea that Arabs are somehow oppressed in Israel is ridiculous. Indeed the Arabs living in Israel and in Judea and Samaria are among the freest and the most prosperous in the Middle East thanks to a genuinely progressive Israeli society. The Arabs and Muslims of Israel and the world should look to Israel as a model and an inspiration as they examine their own regressive and putrid societies. Israel represents the potential contained in an embrace of faith and freedom.


The Arabs of Israel should be offered the option of Israeli citizenship that includes a loyalty oath or, if they refuse, they should be expelled. This would be the policy of any sane society that expects a secure a future for its own people. No nation can survive, let alone prosper, with a large segment of its population that is not only dis-loyal but is seditiously engaging in war against the host country. No other nation would tolerate such a state of affairs.


So yes, Ezra Schwartz life and death is and will be a meaningful life and a meaningful death if we understand its meaning. Jewish lives matter not only for Jews but for all who hope for a world oriented on principles of freedom and peace.

Monday, November 23, 2015

3 OF A KIND: ISLAM, COMMUNISM, NAZISM

By Chuck Morse
As the bombs are rightfully dropped on the heads of ISIS in Syria, we should pause and acknowledge that no bomb will put out the fire that rages in the minds of growing cadres of ISIS followers in over 40 countries. We should note that our Western civilization gave birth to a similar form of pestilence with the advent of the 20th century’s two progressive movements, Communism and Nazism.
The Islamic Jihad has marched forth since Muhammad’s forces thundered out of Arabia in the seventh century, brutally destroying long-standing Christian societies in Syria, Egypt, North Africa and Spain. The Western Jihad, called Revolution, first reared its head in France, ironically, in 1793 when radical Jacobins co-opted the pro-American French Revolution with a Reign of Terror.
The ideology off all three is essentially the same, only dressed in different garb, and we ought to come to grips with it if we are to be free from fear and terror. The similarity begins with a desire to replace sovereign free individuals, self-determined, under God, with an earthy all-controlling world government. While Islam calls this dar al-Islam, the Communists called it the Dictatorship of the Proletariat and the Nazis called it the New Social Order. The method of achieving this lofty goal, wrapped in the case of Islam in the alleged language of “God” and for Communism and Nazism in the high sounding language of “science,” is Jihad for Islam, Revolution for Communists and Blitzkrieg for Nazis.
Shariah is the Islamic version of the Communist and Nazi nanny state where the government controls virtually every aspect of the life of the person for the so-called common good. Islam, like Communism and like Nazism, seeks to transform humanity into a new type of being. In the case of Islam, this requires total submission to their conception of God as, indeed, the word Islam itself translates to mean submission to God. For the Communist, this is expressed as collectivism, which occurs when the individual surrenders his property, his right to trade, his family and his very identity for the good of the collective and in the interests of total equality. For the Nazi, this involved a Darwinian-influenced conception of the evolution of the human species through breeding and racial purity to achieve a more advanced human race that the Nazis called the ubermench.
Islam practices taqiyya, which permits the Muslim to lie and to subvert when living as a minority in a host nation if lying furthers the cause of Islam, which is Jihad, Shariah and dar al-Islam. Communism sanctions lying and subversion when performed in the interest of the revolution. The developed Communist internalizes lying as a fine art by which he can seamlessly express two opposing ideas in the same sentence without being noticed. This highly accomplished form of deception called the dialectic was used in Nazism to approved of anything and everything required to push forward the will to power. All three political faiths developed complex and sophisticated usage of language filled with code words, sophistries, evasions, lies and dog whistles meant to be only discernible to their respective followers. All three faiths maintain informal levels of secretive underground activity by which they conduct their subversions by means of fraud and influence and, when all else fails, war and terror.
The three political faiths employ versions of a central conspiracy theory which holds that an outside force is attempting to destroy them. They must therefore respond by destroying the outside force first in order to survive and succeed – and, indeed, such destruction is of the highest moral order. In the case of Islam, this outside force is the infidel, the dar es Harb, the world of war, the portion of the planet that has not submitted to Islam. For the Communist this force is internal, it is those who are deemed to be not politically correct, the enemy of the masses as identified as such by the approved elite theoreticians. For the Nazis it is the Jews. The perceived enemy is understood to be plotting to exploit or to outright destroy the righteous ones. In this sense, the three political faiths are involved in what Sigmund Freud called projecting, by which they project their own agenda onto their perceived opposition.
All three faiths offer their adherents, most of who are recruited when they are young and impressionable, the exciting work of changing the world and human nature and of literally re-molding reality. Such a sense of power over others has intoxicated generations from time immemorial. Young people, most often from privileged backgrounds, are drawn into these movements as a response to their own sense of alienation and moral disconnect. Young people seeking to “find themselves” find in these movements instant acceptance and friendship with no effort on their part other than a nod in the direction of submission to a pre-set body of ideals.
All three faiths thus re-invent realities to suit their own image, and these realities are divorced from actual conventional reality. The assumed right to create new realities means that the faiths, led by respective experts, can invent and re-invent morality to suit their relative needs at a given time. Thus anything goes in the name of the Jihad, the Revolution, the Blitzkrieg – which replaces conventional morality as the only virtue that holds any meaning or truth. This is why the Nazi can participate in a Holocaust, or the Communist can participate in the forced starvation of millions, or the Islamist can machine gun people at a rock concert or a soccer stadium in Paris and believe that they are behaving morally. After all, it’s good if it’s done to advance the agenda of the new world where all of mankind is transformed.

Chuck Morse is the author of numerous books including “The Nazi Connection to Islamic Terrorism” and the soon to be released “Communism is not Dead.”

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/11/3-of-a-kind-islam-communism-nazism/#SgCebevLjDTKET0e.99

Friday, November 20, 2015

Why the Crusades failed

A brief study of the failure of the 12th Century Christian crusade against the Islamic Jihad sheds light on the crisis of today and points us in the direction of what can be done. Before examining this question, it should be noted that much of the world has accepted the Islamic view of the Crusades, a view that holds that they were a Christian war of aggression against Muslim lands. The historic truth is that the Crusades represented the first time the Christian nations pushed back against the Islamic Jihad which had thundered out of Arabia centuries earlier, a Jihad that had totally consumed long-standing Christian societies in Syria, Egypt, North Africa and Spain. Islamic forces were still on the march when, in 1095, Pope Urban II called for what was essentially a counter-Jihad. Urban responded to reports of Christians being slaughtered as they made pilgrimages to the Holy Land.

The Christian Crusade failed in the first year after the establishment by the Knights Templar of the Kingdom of Jerusalem. Once the Knights Templar forces had established themselves in Jerusalem, they sent for their wives and children who arrived from France to settle down. Soon after they arrived, the wives and children went on an excursion to the banks of the Jordan River to picnic, to play, and to pray. On their way back to Jerusalem they were ambushed and slaughtered by a gang of Saracens, what Medieval Christians called the Arabs.

The Christian government in Jerusalem responded to the atrocity by building fortifications and walls. They cowered in fortified cities and they only ventured out under heavy guard. European Christians responded by refusing to settle in such a dangerous place. The result, which became more apparent in the following decades, was that the Christian Kingdom turned into an occupation as opposed to a flourishing, organic, sustainable society. Thus the Christian Crusaders sealed their own fate. They were doomed to the defeat that inevitably overtook them one they retreated.

Thus the Saracen Jihad was able to defeat the Medieval Christian Crusade not through the force of arms, or through the power of persuasion, and not because they represented a better or more progressive form of society, but rather through the use of terror.

The parallel between the cause of the failure of the Crusades and the threat we live under today, as we fear going to New York City on Thanksgiving, is obvious. The Crusader leaders failed to take stock of the crisis then in the same way that our leadership today not only ignores the crisis but actually, and quite bizarrely, refuses to protect our nation by sealing our borders to terrorists. Instead, we are twisting ourselves into pretzels as we argue over how many Arabs to let in.

Thursday, November 19, 2015

I’m with Trump

I’m with Donald Trump for President because Trump speaks to the little guy, the working man, the American who seeks to make sense out of years of demented and illogical policies and duplicitous pronouncements. Trump speaks American. He speaks in simple direct sentences. He doesn’t engage in the highly sophistic double-talk that is the norm of the left-wing establishment elite, the top 1%, those who hold the bulk of wealth and power in this country, those who are predominantly liberal.

The latest fashion for the left, a reflection of their illogical duplicity and fundamental venality, their malevolent anti-Americanism, is the push for America to welcome hundreds of thousands of Syrian refugees. They deceitfully claim that this is necessary to save lives while they engage in classic agit-prop by accusing the opposition of bigotry toward Muslims. Perhaps, at first glance, we should congratulate the left for finally finding a religion they can admire.

Trump, thinking like the successful businessman that he is, addresses the refugee crisis by advocating a policy that would meet the dual objective of saving innocent life while preserving American safety and national interest. He logically proposes an armed safe zone inside Syria and humanitarian aid, temporary housing, food, supplies, to be paid for by oil rich Gulf States which, he notes, are actually richer than the United States as they have no debt.

Americans of most political persuasions are sick and tired of the bizarre policies that have eroded our safety and our national confidence. Even most liberals want to live in a strong secure nation where their children can inherit an intact if not a prosperous society based upon individual rights and opportunity. Most Americans understand the virtue and the truly progressive nature of freedom, self-interest and success. Donald Trump embodies those virtues.

The left recently criticized Trump for stating that he started out with a million dollar loan from his father. They claimed that this was proof that Trump couldn’t relate to the plight of the average American who struggles from paycheck to paycheck or that he couldn’t relate to poverty. They entirely miss the point which is that Trump took that million and he turned it into billions due to his discipline, imagination, willingness to take risks, and his pluck. In the process, he created wealth where it didn’t exist before and he created jobs =and opportunities at all levels. In this respect Trump, operating from the vantage point of self-interest, has engaged in more social good than has anyone else running for president. This is especially true when compared to Hillary Clinton who has been essentially a corrupt corporate lawyer and political hack who has shaken down multi-national corporations and foreign dictators for enormous sums of un-earned money. Trump got his billions the old fashioned way, he earned them.


This is why I’m with Trump. He is a proven competent businessman who knows how to solve problems and take calculated risks. He speaks plainly and honestly so we know where he stands whether or not we agree. He is an American success story and he embodies the American ethos and spirit that we yearn to see emerge again. He is truly one of us.

The Islamic Crisis

Chuck Morse is the author of numerous books including “The Nazi Connection to Islamic Terrorism” and the soon to be released “Communism is not Dead.”

As the bombs are rightfully dropped on the heads of ISIS in Syria we should pause and acknowledge that no bomb will put out the fire that rages in the minds of growing cadres of ISIS followers in over 40 countries. We should note that our western civilization gave birth to a similar form of pestilence with the advent of the 20th Centuries two progressive movements, Communism and Nazism. The Islamic Jihad has marched forth since Muhammad’s forces thundered out of Arabia in the 7th Century, brutally destroying long-standing Christian societies in Syria, Egypt, North Africa and Spain. The Communist and Nazi Jihad, called Revolution, first reared its head in France, ironically, in 1793 when radical Jacobins co-opted the pro-American French Revolution with a Reign of Terror.

The ideology and the beliefs are essentially the same, only dressed in different garb, and we ought to inoculate ourselves from the disease if we are to be free from fear and terror. The similarity begins with a desire to replace sovereign free individuals, self-determined, under God, with an earthy all controlling world government. While Islam calls for dar al-Islam, Communists called for a Dictatorship of the Proletariat and Nazis a  New Social Order. The methods of achieving these lofty goals, wrapped in the case of Islam in the alleged language of “God” and in the case of Communism and the Nazism the high sounding language of “science,” is Jihad, for Islam, Revolution, for Communism and Blitzkrieg for Nazism.

Sharia is the Islamic version of the Communist and Nazi nanny-state where government controls virtually every aspect of the life of the person for the so-called common good. Islam, like Communism and like Nazism, seeks to transform humanity into a new type of being. In the case of Islam this requires total submission to their conception of God as, indeed, the word Islam itself translates to mean submission to God. For the Communist this is expressed as collectivism, which occurs when the individual surrenders his property, his right to trade, his faith, his family and his very identity for the good of the collective and in the interests of total equality. For the Nazi this involved a Darwinian influenced conception of the evolution of the human species through breeding and racial purity to achieve a more advanced and perfected human race that the Nazis called the ubermench.

Islam practices taquyya which permits the Muslim to lie and to subvert, when living as a minority in a host nation, if lying furthers the cause of Islam which is Jihad, Sharia, and dar al-Islam. Communism sanctions lies and subversion when this is performed in the interests of the revolution. The developed communist internalizes lying as a fine art by which he can seamlessly express two opposing ideas in the same sentence without being noticed. This highly accomplished form of deception is called the dialectic.  Nazism approved of anything and everything required to push forward the will to power. All three political faiths developed complex and sophisticated usage of language filled with code words, sophistries, evasions, lies and dog whistles meant to be only discernable to their respective followers. All three faiths maintain informal levels of secretive informal underground activity by which they conduct their subversions by means of fraud and influence and, when all else fails, war and terror.

The three political faiths employ versions of a central conspiracy theory which holds that an outside force is attempting to destroy them. They must therefore respond by destroying the outside force first in order to survive and succeed and, indeed, such destruction is of the highest moral order.  In the case of Islam, this outside force is the infidel, the dar es Harb, the world of war, the portion of the planet that has not submitted to Islam. For the Communist this force is internal, it is those who are deemed to be not politically correct, the enemy of the masses as identified as such by the approved elite theoreticians. For the Nazis it is the Jews. The perceived enemy is understood to be plotting to exploit or to outright destroy the righteous ones. In this sense, the three political faiths are involved in what Sigmund Freud called projecting, which is that they project their own agenda on to their perceived opposition.

All three faiths offer their adherents, most of who are recruited when they are young and impressionable; the exciting work of changing the world and human nature and of literally re-molding reality. Such a sense of power over others has intoxicated generations from time immemorial. Young people, most often from privileged backgrounds, are drawn into these movements as a response to their own sense of alienation and moral disconnect. Young people seeking to “find themselves” find in these movements instant acceptance and friendship with no effort on their part other than a nod in the direction of submission to a pre-set body of ideals.


All three faiths thus re-invent realities to suit their own image and these realities are divorced from actual conventional reality. The assumed right to create new realities means that the faiths, led by respective experts, can invent and re-invent morality to suit their relative needs at a given time. Thus anything goes in the name of the Jihad, the Revolution, the Blitzkrieg which replaces conventional morality as the only virtue that holds any meaning or truth. This is why the Nazi can participate in a Holocaust, or the Communist can participate in the forced starvation of millions, or the Islamist can machine gun people at a rock concert or a soccer stadium in Paris and believe that they are behaving morally. After all, it’s good if it’s done to advance the agenda of the new world where all of mankind is transformed.

Wednesday, November 18, 2015

Parsha Commentary by Chuck Morse: Parshat Vayeitzei - The mission of the Chosen Peop...

Parsha Commentary by Chuck Morse: Parshat Vayeitzei - The mission of the Chosen Peop...: In Parshat Vayeitzei, Genesis 28: 10-22, God promised Jacob, in a dream, that his children, his nation, would inherit the land that is know...

Monday, November 9, 2015